EPA loses power to review federal bills before they become law
H.R. 6398 — RED Tape Act · Filed by John Joyce (R-PA) · Introduced Dec 3, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends Section 309 of the Clean Air Act to remove the EPA's authority to review and comment on proposed federal legislation and major federal agency actions before they are finalized. Currently, the EPA can weigh in on bills and federal projects that may affect air quality; this bill strips that review power, leaving the EPA unable to formally assess environmental impacts of new laws or major federal actions.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is to strip the EPA of a specific review and comment authority under the Clean Air Act. While framed as reducing 'duplicative' regulations, the actual effect is to eliminate EPA's pre-enactment environmental assessment role, which is a deregulatory move that reduces government oversight of federal legislative and agency action.
What the text implies
- Removes EPA's formal role in assessing air-quality impacts of federal legislation before passage, potentially allowing bills with significant air-pollution consequences to advance without documented environmental review.
- Eliminates EPA comment authority on major federal agency actions (e.g., infrastructure projects, energy development), shifting environmental assessment burden away from the EPA and potentially to other agencies with weaker air-quality mandates.
- May reduce public transparency: EPA comments on proposed legislation and actions are often public record and inform congressional debate; their removal could obscure environmental trade-offs from legislators and constituents.
- The bill's title ('Reducing and Eliminating Duplicative Environmental Regulations') frames the change as anti-redundancy, but the actual target is EPA's advisory/review role, not a duplicative regulatory standard—the framing may obscure the true scope of EPA authority being removed.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens lose a formal mechanism for environmental review and public accountability before federal legislation and major agency actions take effect. The EPA's pre-enactment comment authority is a transparency and deliberation safeguard; removing it reduces the opportunity for environmental concerns to be aired and weighed before decisions are final.
Who stands to gain
- industries subject to air-quality regulation (fossil fuel, manufacturing, transportation, energy)
- federal agencies seeking to avoid pre-enactment environmental scrutiny
Named in the bill
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Clean Air Act, Section 309 of the Clean Air Act, Federal agencies, Congress
Where it stands
- Dec 3, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Dec 3, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce and Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment”
- Dec 10, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jan 21, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 22”
- Apr 16, 2026 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 222 - 205 (Roll no. 118)”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
15 lobbying clients named this bill on 19 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $63,652,324 in lobbying spend. A filing names 29 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 95% of bills with at least one filing.
John Joyce, the sponsor, reported $1,473,437 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. — $54,660,000 on 3 filings
- American Petroleum Institute — $4,700,000 on 2 filings
- American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers — $1,160,000 on 1 filing
- National Mining Association — $820,000 on 1 filing
- American Forest & Paper Association — $710,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (826 characters) on Jul 10, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“EPA loses power to review federal bills before they become law” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr6398 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.