QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to end private immigrant detention, shift burden to government

H.R. 6397 — Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act · Filed by Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) · 134 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 3, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Immigrant Detention Reform & Accountability

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill establishes minimum detention standards for immigrants held by the Department of Homeland Security, based on American Bar Association guidelines. It requires annual inspections, public reporting of facility conditions, prohibits private for-profit detention contracts (phasing them out over 3 years), bans detention of children under 18, eliminates mandatory detention, creates a presumption of release with strict burden-of-proof requirements on the government, establishes community-based alternatives to detention, and creates civil remedies for detainees injured by standard violations.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is establishing binding detention standards, enforcement via inspection and civil liability, and shifting the legal presumption from detention to release. It is fundamentally a reform of government detention authority and a rights-expansion measure for a vulnerable population.

What the text implies

  • Elimination of mandatory detention (Section 10) removes a significant tool for immigration enforcement; combined with the presumption of release, this may substantially reduce the detained population and require DHS to develop alternative supervision infrastructure.
  • The 3-year phase-out of private detention facilities (Section 7) will require DHS to construct and operate new government-owned facilities or dramatically reduce detention capacity, with major budgetary implications.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

nonprofit organizations operating legal orientation programs; nonprofit community-based organizations providing case management services; immigration law service providers

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record