Congress targets illegal fishing with sanctions, protecting marine ecosystems and crew labor rights
H.R. 6338 — Stop Illegal Fishing Act · Filed by Gregory Meeks (D-NY) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 1, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill authorizes the President to impose sanctions—including asset freezes and visa revocations—against foreign individuals and vessels engaged in illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. The sanctions target vessel owners, captains, senior crew, and managers of fishing entities that violate international maritime law. The bill requires annual reporting to Congress and creates a dedicated IUU fishing sanctions program, with exceptions for humanitarian aid, crew safety, and UN headquarters access.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a sanctions regime targeting illegal fishing to protect marine ecosystems, coastal economies, and crew labor standards. It is framed and functions as a conservation and human-rights enforcement tool, not a trade or economic carve-out.
What the text implies
- Sanctions authority is delegated to the President with broad discretion; congressional oversight is limited to post-hoc reporting rather than pre-approval, creating potential for executive overreach or selective enforcement.
- The bill's focus on China as 'the primary perpetrator' may signal geopolitical intent beyond fisheries enforcement; sanctions could become a tool in broader U.S.–China competition rather than neutral marine conservation.
- Visa revocation and asset blocking may affect U.S. business relationships with foreign fishing companies and their employees, potentially disrupting legitimate supply chains if enforcement is overly broad.
- The humanitarian and crew-safety exceptions are broadly written and may create loopholes that undermine sanctions effectiveness if interpreted permissively by the executive branch.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill protects marine ecosystems and coastal communities—especially in developing nations—from overfishing and resource depletion, while addressing labor abuses (forced labor, human trafficking) aboard illegal fishing vessels. U.S. citizens benefit from marine conservation and reduced economic harm to domestic fisheries. The sanctions mechanism is transparent and subject to congressional oversight via mandatory reporting.
Who stands to gain
- U.S. commercial fishing industry (reduced competition from illegal foreign vessels)
- Coastal communities and developing-nation fisheries (resource protection)
Named in the bill
President of the United States, Secretary of State, Secretary of Homeland Security, House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, People's Republic of China, United Nations, International Emergency Economic Powers Act, Maritime SAFE Act, Immigration and Nationality Act
Where it stands
3 cosponsors: 2 Republicans, 1 Democrats.
- Dec 1, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Dec 1, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary and House Committee on Foreign Affairs · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period…”
- Dec 3, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Dec 3, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 47 - 2”
- Jun 8, 2026 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3968-3969)”
- Jun 8, 2026 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Mast moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $50,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 5 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Gregory Meeks, the sponsor, reported $992,428 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- International Labour Organization — $50,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 19, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (7,550 characters) on Jul 8, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 19, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress targets illegal fishing with sanctions, protecting marine ecosystems and crew labor rights” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr6338 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.