Federal workers lose relocation cost guarantees in new lump-sum scheme
H.R. 6330 — Federal Relocation Payment Improvement Act · Filed by Brian Jack (R-GA) · Introduced Dec 1, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill allows federal agencies to pay relocated employees a one-time lump-sum payment instead of reimbursing actual relocation expenses item-by-item. The General Services Administration will write rules governing when agencies can use this option, how to calculate the lump sum, and how employees can dispute their agency's decision. Agencies must report back in 3 years on how many employees received lump-sum payments, how many challenged their agency's decision, and what cost savings resulted.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is administrative simplification—replacing itemized reimbursement with a discretionary lump-sum option. It is not a tax measure, appropriation, or deregulation, but a procedural change to how federal agencies handle relocation costs.
What the text implies
- Lump-sum payments may systematically undercompensate employees in high-cost relocation markets (e.g., DC, San Francisco), while overcompensating those in low-cost areas, creating hidden geographic inequity.
- The bill grants agencies discretion to choose between lump-sum and itemized reimbursement on a case-by-case basis, potentially enabling selective use to favor or disfavor certain employees or relocations.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Federal government (via potential cost savings from lump-sum caps); Federal agencies (administrative efficiency and budget predictability)