QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal funding tied to abortion ban on college campuses

H.R. 632 — Protecting Life on College Campus Act of 2025 · Filed by Chip Roy (R-TX) · 31 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 22, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernReproductive Healthcare Restriction

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill prohibits federal funding to colleges and universities that host or affiliate with on-campus health clinics providing abortion drugs or abortion services to students or employees. Institutions must certify annually that no affiliated clinic provides these services to remain eligible for federal funds. The bill defines 'abortion drug' broadly to include any substance intended to terminate pregnancy, except in cases of ectopic pregnancy, dead fetus removal, or live birth.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a federal funding prohibition tied to abortion service provision. It is not a general education bill; it is a targeted restriction on reproductive healthcare access at colleges, using federal funding as leverage.

What the text implies

  • The definition of 'abortion drug' is extremely broad and may capture medications used for other purposes (e.g., miscarriage management, ectopic pregnancy treatment) if they can be used to terminate pregnancy, creating ambiguity in compliance.
  • Colleges may respond by closing on-campus clinics entirely or severing affiliations with health providers, reducing access to all reproductive healthcare (contraception, STI testing, prenatal care) not just abortion.
  • The annual certification requirement creates a surveillance and reporting mechanism that may chill institutional willingness to provide any reproductive health services, even those unrelated to abortion.
  • Students and employees at under-resourced institutions may lack alternative access to abortion services, creating disparate impact by geography and socioeconomic status.
  • The bill does not define 'affiliated with' precisely, creating legal uncertainty about which clinics trigger the funding ban and exposing institutions to litigation risk.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Students and employees at affected institutions lose access to abortion services on campus, narrowing reproductive healthcare options and potentially forcing them to travel for care. The bill also creates compliance burdens and financial jeopardy for colleges, which may reduce institutional autonomy and educational quality. The restriction applies regardless of whether the clinic is student-funded or independently operated.

Named in the bill

institutions of higher education, Secretary of Education, Secretary of Health and Human Services, school-based service sites, Higher Education Act of 1965, Social Security Act

Where it stands

31 cosponsors: 31 Republicans.

  • Jan 22, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Jan 22, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Education and Workforce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,084 characters) on Apr 14, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Federal funding tied to abortion ban on college campuses” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr632 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.