Congress demands detailed public report on China's AI power to guide export controls
H.R. 6275 — China AI Power Report Act · Filed by James (Jim) Moylan (R-GU) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 21, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to submit an annual report for three years detailing China's advanced AI capabilities, including assessments of Chinese AI chip design, semiconductor manufacturing, AI models, robotics, and research. The report must cover supply chains, production capacity, foreign technology dependencies, and the effectiveness of US export controls, with most findings published unclassified to inform congressional oversight of export control policy.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to mandate systematic intelligence collection and reporting on a foreign adversary's AI capabilities to support US export control policy. It is not a regulatory change or appropriation, but a transparency and oversight mechanism.
What the text implies
- The unclassified report will create a detailed public intelligence product on Chinese AI capabilities, production, and supply chains—potentially useful to foreign actors, competitors, or Chinese entities seeking to understand US intelligence gaps and priorities.
- The bill mandates assessment of 'licit or illicit' technology transfer and IP theft methods, but does not authorize enforcement action or sanctions; it is a reporting mechanism only, creating a risk of intelligence disclosure without corresponding policy response.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
US semiconductor and AI chip design companies (AMD, NVIDIA, Qualcomm, Intel) — indirectly, through e; US defense contractors and national security agencies — through enhanced intelligence on competitor; US EDA and semiconductor equipment manufacturers — potential beneficiaries of export control tighten