Congress orders study on why aviation still uses paper for aircraft parts
H.R. 6267 — Aviation Supply Chain Safety and Security Digitization Act of 2025 · Filed by Brad Knott (R-NC) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 21, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the Government Accountability Office (Comptroller General) to study why the aviation industry has not switched from paper to digital documentation for aircraft parts, maintenance records, and supplier verification. The study will examine barriers faced by manufacturers, repair stations, airlines, and parts brokers in adopting digital forms and authentication tools, and will recommend ways to speed up the transition to digital records across the industry and within the FAA itself.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is a directive to the GAO to conduct a study and report on barriers to digital documentation in aviation supply chains. It contains no regulatory changes, appropriations, or industry carve-outs—only a fact-finding and recommendation process.
What the text implies
- Study findings may reveal that FAA legacy systems are a primary impediment, potentially triggering pressure for federal IT modernization spending.
- Recommendations could lead to mandatory digital documentation standards, which would impose compliance costs on smaller repair stations and parts brokers with limited IT infrastructure.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
software and cybersecurity vendors (digital authentication and verification tools); IT consulting and systems integration firms (FAA legacy system modernization); cloud infrastructure providers (centralized digital documentation platforms)