Congress mandates parental control over teen messaging, bans disappearing messages
H.R. 6257 — SMK Act of 2025 · Filed by Neal Dunn (R-FL) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Nov 21, 2025 · Markup held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits social media platforms from offering disappearing-message features (like Snapchat's Stories) to minors under 17, and requires platforms to provide parents with tools to control and monitor their child's direct messaging. Platforms must disable direct messaging by default for children under 13 unless parents explicitly consent, and must warn parents when their child tries to download a messaging app. The bill is enforced by the FTC and state attorneys general.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a direct regulatory prohibition (no ephemeral messaging for minors) paired with a mandatory parental-control infrastructure requirement. It is not a tax measure, subsidy, or commemorative act—it is straightforward consumer protection regulation targeting a specific harm (predatory contact, evidence destruction).
What the text implies
- Platforms may respond by raising age-of-service requirements or implementing stricter age-verification systems, which could reduce minors' access to legitimate peer communication and community-building features entirely.
- The 'verifiable parental consent' standard (cross-referenced to COPPA) may create friction for divorced/separated families or minors in foster care, where parental authority is contested or unclear.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
parental-control software vendors; age-verification technology providers; compliance consulting firms specializing in child-safety regulation