QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress cuts red tape for wetland restoration—but shifts costs to flood insurance pool

H.R. 6256 — Floodplain Enhancement and Recovery Act · Filed by Troy Downing (R-MT) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 21, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Environmental Regulatory Relief

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the National Flood Insurance Program to exempt ecosystem restoration projects from flood map review fees and allow communities to permit certain restoration projects in floodways even if they raise flood elevations by up to 1 foot, provided no structures are harmed and the community reports results within 180 days. The bill aims to reduce regulatory barriers to wetland and floodplain restoration while maintaining safety thresholds.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a fee waiver and conditional-approval exemption for ecosystem restoration projects under the National Flood Insurance Program. While framed as environmental recovery, the primary effect is regulatory streamlining for a specific class of projects.

What the text implies

  • Fee exemption may reduce FEMA's cost recovery for flood map administration, shifting costs to the general flood insurance pool and potentially raising premiums for non-restoration-related claims.
  • The 1-foot elevation increase allowance, while capped, creates a new precedent for accepting higher base flood elevations in regulatory floodways—a shift from prior strict no-rise standards that may be difficult to reverse.
  • Communities with limited engineering capacity may struggle to comply with the 180-day post-project reporting requirement, creating compliance gaps and potential liability disputes.
  • Private developers and conservation nonprofits may use ecosystem restoration framing to justify floodway projects that primarily serve private land value enhancement rather than genuine ecological recovery.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Ordinary citizens benefit from lower-cost ecosystem restoration that reduces long-term flood risk and improves natural flood resilience, offsetting modest increases in flood insurance program costs. The safety guardrails (no structures in impact zones, 1-foot elevation cap, engineer review) protect homeowners from uncontrolled floodway modification.

Who stands to gain

  • conservation nonprofits and environmental contractors
  • private landowners with floodplain property
  • engineering firms conducting restoration assessments

Named in the bill

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014, National Flood Insurance Program, Federal and State natural resource agencies, AIG, CBRE, FBK, FMAO, PRU

Where it stands

8 cosponsors: 4 Democrats, 4 Republicans.

  • Nov 21, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Nov 21, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

4 lobbying clients named this bill on 4 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,077,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 35 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 72% of bills with at least one filing.

Troy Downing, the sponsor, reported $762,100 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • Nature Conservancy — $900,000 on 1 filing
  • Trout Unlimited — $120,000 on 1 filing
  • Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership — $50,000 on 1 filing
  • Environmental Policy Innovation Center — $7,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,090 characters) on Aug 14, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Congress cuts red tape for wetland restoration—but shifts costs to flood insurance pool” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr6256 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.