QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates algorithmic transparency and choice for minors online

H.R. 6253 — Algorithmic Transparency and Choice Act · Filed by Kat Cammack (R-FL) · Introduced Nov 21, 2025 · Markup held

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Consumer Protection (Minors)

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires online platforms to disclose how their recommendation algorithms work to minors (under 18) and give minors control over those systems. Platforms must explain what data they collect, how it's used, and what the algorithm optimizes for. Minors get the right to switch to a simpler, non-personalized algorithm by default, limit recommendation categories, or modify their profile. The FTC enforces violations as unfair or deceptive practices. Platforms cannot be forced to reveal trade secrets or proprietary details.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a disclosure and choice mandate protecting minors from opaque algorithmic manipulation. It is not a tax measure, subsidy, or deregulation; it is a straightforward consumer protection rule enforced by the FTC.

What the text implies

  • Platforms may respond by degrading the non-personalized default algorithm's quality or user experience, creating pressure for minors to opt back into personalization despite the choice being available.
  • The definition of 'input-transparent algorithm' permits use of data 'expressly provided' by the user, which includes approximate geolocation and saved preferences—platforms may still infer and optimize on these, narrowing the practical difference from personalized systems.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Minors gain transparency into how platforms manipulate their attention and content exposure, plus concrete control mechanisms (opt-out, algorithm switching, profile modification). These are direct protections against algorithmic manipulation targeting a vulnerable population.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record