QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress caps Medicare Advantage plans per insurer—simplifying choice or cutting options?

H.R. 6113 — To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to impose limitations on contracts with Medicare Advantage organizations offering multiple Medicare Advantage plans under the Medicare program. · Filed by Mark Pocan (D-WI) · 15 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 18, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Medicare Advantage Plan Limitation

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill limits how many Medicare Advantage plans a single insurance organization can offer. Starting one year after enactment, Medicare can contract with an MA organization for at most 3 plans per year, and any plan beyond the first must be 'significantly different' in price, benefits, or cost-sharing. The goal appears to be reducing plan proliferation and complexity for seniors.

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole operative mechanism is a regulatory ceiling on the number and differentiation of MA plans a single organization may contract to offer. It is a structural constraint on market participation, not a subsidy, carve-out, or commemorative measure.

What the text implies

  • The 'significantly different' standard in subsection (j)(2) is delegated to the Secretary without statutory definition, creating regulatory discretion that could be applied inconsistently or challenged as arbitrary.
  • MA organizations currently offering 4+ plans may be forced to consolidate or exit markets, potentially reducing competition in some regions and concentrating enrollment in fewer plans.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Medicare (reduced administrative overhead from fewer contracts); MA organizations with 1–3 plans (competitive advantage; fewer rivals offering multiple plans)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record