QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to strip states of immunity for police constitutional violations

H.R. 6092 — Constitutional Accountability Act · Filed by Hank Johnson (D-GA) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 18, 2025 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Police Accountability & Civil Rights Remedy

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends federal civil rights law (Section 1983) to make the United States, states, and local governments directly liable for monetary damages when their law enforcement officers violate citizens' constitutional rights—without requiring plaintiffs to prove the violation resulted from an official policy or custom. Currently, courts shield states and municipalities from such liability under doctrines the bill calls outdated; this bill removes those shields and makes governments liable for their officers' constitutional torts the way private employers are liable for employee wrongdoing.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is expanding government liability for law enforcement constitutional violations. It is framed as a civil rights enforcement measure grounded in the 14th Amendment and designed to incentivize better police training, hiring, and discipline—a public accountability mechanism, not a market-facing carve-out.

What the text implies

  • Removes qualified immunity-adjacent doctrines (Monell, Will) for government entities, potentially increasing litigation volume against municipalities and states, which may strain budgets and force reallocation of public resources.
  • Creates direct liability for the U.S. government for federal law enforcement violations, a significant expansion of federal tort exposure that may require new appropriations for settlements and judgments.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

civil rights attorneys and plaintiff's bar (increased litigation and damages awards); victims of police misconduct (direct access to government compensation)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record