QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress quietly grants immigration relief to one woman—without disclosing why

H.R. 6073 — For the relief of Maria Merida de Macario. · Filed by Seth Moulton (D-MA) · Introduced Nov 17, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Private Immigration Relief Bill

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This private bill grants Maria Merida de Macario permanent resident status in the United States, bypassing normal immigration law restrictions. The bill waives any grounds for removal or denial of admission that appear in DHS or State Department records as of enactment, and requires her to file an application within two years. In exchange, one immigrant visa slot is deducted from her country of birth's annual allocation, and her immediate family members are barred from receiving preferential immigration treatment based on their relationship to her.

Why we flagged it

This is a private bill granting permanent resident status to a specific named individual, Maria Merida de Macario. Private bills are a routine legislative mechanism for individual immigration relief when standard statutory pathways are unavailable or inappropriate.

What the text implies

  • The bill waives all grounds for removal or denial of admission on record as of enactment, potentially including criminal convictions, fraud, or security concerns that would normally bar permanent residence.
  • The two-year filing deadline creates a time-sensitive window; if the applicant does not file within this period, all relief provisions expire, leaving her in her prior immigration status.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Private immigration relief bills are a legitimate legislative tool for cases where individual circumstances warrant exception to standard law. However, the broad waiver of all grounds for removal—without public disclosure of what those grounds are—creates opacity about whether serious security, criminal, or fraud concerns are being overlooked.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record