Congress quietly expands tax breaks for semiconductor makers through 2031
H.R. 6055 — SEMI Investment Act · Filed by Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) · 11 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 17, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill expands the federal advanced manufacturing investment credit (a tax break for building semiconductor factories) to include materials used in semiconductor production—both materials physically incorporated into chips and specialized chemicals, gases, and equipment used in manufacturing. It extends the credit through 2031 and requires the Treasury Department to publish and maintain a list of qualifying materials, with a process for companies to petition for new materials to be added.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a tax credit (foregone federal revenue) extended and expanded to benefit semiconductor manufacturers and their supply-chain vendors. While framed as supporting 'essential manufacturing,' the bill does not regulate, mandate, or restrict industry behavior—it simply reduces the tax burden on a specific sector.
What the text implies
- The bill delegates material-qualification authority to the Treasury Secretary and Department of Commerce, creating an administrative process that may favor incumbent suppliers and create barriers to entry for new competitors in the materials supply chain.
- The 'indirect production material' definition is broad and includes items like 'any other material identified by Sec.' — a blank-check delegation that could expand the credit's scope beyond current legislative intent without further congressional action.
- The credit applies to property placed in service after enactment but extends through 2031, creating a multi-year tax expenditure whose total cost to the federal budget is not quantified in the bill text.
- By subsidizing materials suppliers as well as chip manufacturers, the bill may entrench existing supply relationships and reduce incentives for innovation in materials science or cost reduction.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill provides a concrete public benefit by incentivizing domestic semiconductor manufacturing capacity, which strengthens supply-chain resilience and reduces dependence on foreign production—a legitimate national-security and economic interest. However, the primary beneficiaries are semiconductor manufacturers and their suppliers (private corporations), and the mechanism is a tax expenditure (foregone federal revenue) that reduces public resources available for other priorities without a cle
Who stands to gain
- semiconductor manufacturers
- semiconductor equipment manufacturers
- specialty chemical and materials suppliers to semiconductor industry
- real estate investment trusts (REITs) that own or lease semiconductor manufacturing facilities
Named in the bill
Internal Revenue Code Section 48D, Treasury Department (Secretary), Department of Commerce, semiconductor manufacturers, semiconductor materials suppliers, Code of Federal Regulations Title 15 Section 231.116
Where it stands
11 cosponsors: 7 Democrats, 4 Republicans.
- Nov 17, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Nov 17, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
11 lobbying clients named this bill on 16 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $59,700,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 6 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 92% of bills with at least one filing.
Brian Fitzpatrick, the sponsor, reported $2,362,211 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. — $54,660,000 on 3 filings
- American Chemistry Council — $2,570,000 on 1 filing
- Semiconductor Industry Association — $880,000 on 2 filings
- Semi — $470,000 on 1 filing
- Corning Incorporated — $330,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (5,032 characters) on Aug 19, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
- H.R. 6055 on Congress.gov
- Actions and status history
- Cosponsors (11)
- Bill text the analysis read
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. — LDA filing, 2026 Q1
- American Chemistry Council — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Semiconductor Industry Association — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Brian Fitzpatrick — FEC candidate receipts, 2026 cycle
“Congress quietly expands tax breaks for semiconductor makers through 2031” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr6055 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.