QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress funds disaster resilience by taxing oil profits and Gulf extraction

H.R. 5983 — National Resilience and Recovery Fund Act · Filed by Melanie Stansbury (D-NM) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 7, 2025 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Energy Tax and Disaster Resilience Funding

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a new federal trust fund for disaster resilience and recovery, funded by three new or expanded taxes on oil and gas: a 10-cent-per-barrel excise tax on crude oil and imported petroleum, a windfall profits tax (50% of price increases above a 2015–2019 baseline) on large oil producers, and a 13% severance tax on crude oil and natural gas extracted from federal leases in the Gulf of Mexico. Revenue from these taxes flows into the National Resilience and Recovery Fund, which FEMA uses to pay for hazard mitigation, flood prevention, and community resilience grants.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is straightforward: it imposes three new taxes on oil and gas production/importation and dedicates the revenue to FEMA disaster-resilience programs. The title accurately reflects this dual purpose—resilience funding via energy taxation.

What the text implies

  • The windfall profits tax applies only to producers/importers exceeding 300,000 barrels per day in 2023 or current quarter, potentially exempting smaller independent producers and creating a two-tier tax structure that may consolidate market share among large integrated oil companies.
  • The severance tax on Gulf of Mexico federal leases (13%) is deductible under section 164, reducing the effective tax burden on producers and shifting some cost to federal income-tax revenue rather than pure energy-sector burden.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

FEMA and federal disaster-resilience programs; State and local governments receiving hazard mitigation and flood-prevention grants; Construction and engineering firms contracted for resilience infrastructure

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record