Federal funding for post-disaster forest and watershed recovery, no local match required.
H.R. 5823 — Watershed Protection and Forest Recovery Act of 2025 · Filed by Joe Neguse (D-CO) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Oct 24, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to fund emergency watershed protection and forest recovery work on National Forest System land after natural disasters or other damaging natural events. It allows the Secretary to pay state, local, tribal, and water district sponsors to carry out erosion control, flood mitigation, and forest health measures, with no matching funds required from sponsors and liability protections for sponsors who act in good faith.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is straightforward: it authorizes federal funding for post-disaster watershed and forest restoration work on public lands, administered through state, local, tribal, and water district partners. This is a public-lands management and disaster-response measure, not a tax or regulatory carve-out.
What the text implies
- Liability shield for sponsors may reduce incentive for careful project design or oversight, particularly if sponsors undertake work before formal agreement and assume all risk.
- NEPA exemption (treating work as 'emergency response') bypasses environmental review that might otherwise identify unintended ecological consequences of watershed interventions.
- No matching-fund requirement may incentivize sponsors to request federal funding for projects they would otherwise fund locally, shifting cost burden to federal taxpayers.
- Two-year completion deadline and three-year monitoring window may be insufficient for complex forest recovery in some ecosystems, potentially leaving work incomplete.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill funds disaster recovery and flood/erosion prevention on public lands, protecting downstream communities and water resources at no cost to local sponsors. However, the broad liability shield for sponsors and expedited NEPA exemption create modest accountability gaps that prevent a stronger verdict.
Who stands to gain
- state and local governments
- Indian tribes
- water districts and water utilities
- construction and environmental consulting firms contracted by sponsors
Named in the bill
Secretary of Agriculture, Forest Service, National Forest System, state and local governments, Indian tribes, water districts, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Agricultural Credit Act of 1978
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 1 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Oct 24, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Oct 24, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Agriculture · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,939 characters) on Aug 17, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal funding for post-disaster forest and watershed recovery, no local match required.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr5823 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.