QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates public database of environmental lawsuits and review timelines

H.R. 573 — Studying NEPA’s Impact on Projects Act · Filed by Rudy Yakym (R-IN) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 21, 2025 · Passed chamber

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Environmental Transparency & Accountability…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires federal agencies to submit annual reports to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) documenting all lawsuits alleging violations of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), including case details, outcomes, and settlements. The CEQ must then publish these reports publicly along with data on environmental impact statement lengths, preparation costs, and timelines, disaggregated by industry sector. The bill creates a comprehensive public database of NEPA litigation and environmental review metrics, with special tracking of 15 named sectors including energy, infrastructure, and mining.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is mandatory public disclosure of NEPA litigation, environmental review metrics, and timelines. It functions as a transparency and accountability tool, not a deregulation or exemption measure, despite the sector-disaggregation language that may signal industry interest in the data.

What the text implies

  • Sector-level disaggregation of NEPA litigation data may enable industry groups to identify and challenge environmental review patterns, potentially informing coordinated legal strategies against specific agencies or review types.
  • Public disclosure of environmental review timelines and costs could create political pressure on agencies to accelerate reviews or reduce scope, even where thorough analysis is warranted, if data shows longer timelines than industry prefers.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Infrastructure and energy development sectors (aviation, broadband, renewable energy, conventional e; Mining and forestry industries; Legal and consulting firms specializing in NEPA litigation and environmental compliance

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record