Banks get shutdown relief guidance—but compliance is voluntary
H.R. 5689 — Shutdown Guidance for Financial Institutions Act · Filed by Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA) · 21 cosponsors · Introduced Oct 3, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires federal banking regulators (the Federal Reserve, CFPB, OCC, FDIC, and NCUA) to jointly issue guidance encouraging banks to help consumers and businesses harmed by government shutdowns—including federal employees, DC workers, and federal contractors—by modifying loan terms, extending credit, and preventing shutdown-related loan modifications from damaging credit scores. The regulators must issue this guidance within 180 days, alert institutions within 24 hours of a shutdown, and report back to Congress 90 days after a shutdown ends on how well the guidance worked.
Why we flagged it
The bill mandates federal financial regulators to issue guidance encouraging banks to work with consumers and businesses harmed by government shutdowns, including loan modifications and credit reporting protections. It is fundamentally a regulatory coordination measure addressing shutdown-related financial hardship.
What the text implies
- The bill does not mandate loan modifications or credit relief—it only 'encourages' banks to consider them 'consistent with safe-and-sound lending practices,' creating ambiguity about enforceability and actual consumer protection during shutdowns.
- The credit reporting provision (preventing adverse coding of modified loans) may create a loophole: banks could modify terms while avoiding credit-score damage, but the guidance's non-binding nature means compliance is voluntary and may vary widely across institutions.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
commercial banks; credit unions; consumer finance companies