QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates detailed terrorist-content reports from Big Tech—with $5M daily penalties

H.R. 5681 — STOP HATE Act of 2025 · Filed by Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Oct 3, 2025 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
28/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernCounterterrorism Transparency & Reporting…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires large social media companies (those with 25+ million US monthly users) to publicly post their terms of service regarding terrorist content and to submit detailed reports to the Attorney General every three months on how they enforce those policies against designated terrorist organizations and individuals. The reports must include data on flagged content, removals, appeals, and trends. Companies that fail to comply face civil penalties up to $5 million per day per violation.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a mandatory disclosure and reporting regime for social media platforms' enforcement of policies against designated terrorist organizations. It is framed as counterterrorism but functions primarily as a transparency and compliance-reporting statute.

What the text implies

  • The bill defines 'terrorist content' by reference to Executive Order 13224 designations, which are executive determinations not subject to judicial review. Platforms must report on enforcement against these designations, potentially creating pressure to over-enforce against borderline content to avoid penalties.
  • Triannual reporting to the Attorney General creates a new federal surveillance mechanism over platform moderation decisions. While reports are published, the Attorney General gains detailed visibility into platform enforcement patterns that could inform future enforcement actions or policy pressure.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

compliance software vendors; content moderation service providers; legal and consulting firms advising platforms on reporting

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record