Fossil fuel companies get veto over renewable projects on their leases
H.R. 5639 — Co-Location Energy Act · Filed by Mike Kennedy (R-UT) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 30, 2025 · Hearing held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill allows renewable energy (solar and wind) projects to be built on the same federal land parcels already leased for oil, gas, coal, or geothermal extraction — a practice called co-location. The Secretary of the Interior can authorize evaluation and permitting of these renewable projects on existing fossil fuel leases, but only with the consent of the current leaseholder. The bill also directs the Interior Department to determine within 180 days whether these renewable projects should be exempt from full environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a permitting pathway for solar and wind on existing federal fossil fuel leases. It is neither a pure renewable-energy promotion nor a fossil fuel subsidy, but rather a regulatory framework that could serve either interest depending on implementation and leaseholder cooperation.
What the text implies
- Leaseholder consent requirement gives fossil fuel companies effective veto power over renewable projects on their leases, potentially allowing them to demand concessions (e.g., extended lease terms, reduced royalties) in exchange for co-location approval.
- The 180-day categorical exclusion determination could exempt renewable projects from full National Environmental Policy Act review, reducing public comment periods and environmental scrutiny on federal lands.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
existing federal oil and gas leaseholders; coal lease operators; geothermal lease operators