Fossil fuel companies get veto over renewable projects on their leases
H.R. 5639 — Co-Location Energy Act · Filed by Mike Kennedy (R-UT) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 30, 2025 · Hearing held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill allows renewable energy (solar and wind) projects to be built on the same federal land parcels already leased for oil, gas, coal, or geothermal extraction — a practice called co-location. The Secretary of the Interior can authorize evaluation and permitting of these renewable projects on existing fossil fuel leases, but only with the consent of the current leaseholder. The bill also directs the Interior Department to determine within 180 days whether these renewable projects should be exempt from full environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a permitting pathway for solar and wind on existing federal fossil fuel leases. It is neither a pure renewable-energy promotion nor a fossil fuel subsidy, but rather a regulatory framework that could serve either interest depending on implementation and leaseholder cooperation.
What the text implies
- Leaseholder consent requirement gives fossil fuel companies effective veto power over renewable projects on their leases, potentially allowing them to demand concessions (e.g., extended lease terms, reduced royalties) in exchange for co-location approval.
- The 180-day categorical exclusion determination could exempt renewable projects from full National Environmental Policy Act review, reducing public comment periods and environmental scrutiny on federal lands.
- Co-location may entrench existing fossil fuel leases by making them more economically viable (dual revenue streams), potentially extending their operational life rather than accelerating their retirement.
- The bill does not specify how royalties, revenue-sharing, or land-use priorities will be allocated between fossil fuel and renewable operators, creating ambiguity about who captures the economic benefit.
Who it affects
The bill creates a pathway for renewable energy development on federal lands, which could accelerate clean energy deployment and reduce emissions — a public benefit. However, by requiring leaseholder consent and potentially exempting projects from full environmental review, it may weaken public oversight and hand veto power to fossil fuel companies already holding the leases, potentially slowing renewable buildout or allowing them to extract concessions.
Who stands to gain
- existing federal oil and gas leaseholders
- coal lease operators
- geothermal lease operators
- renewable energy developers (conditional on leaseholder consent)
Named in the bill
Secretary of the Interior, Mineral Leasing Act, Geothermal Steam Act of 1970, Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, EXE (Exelon Corporation), WEC (WEC Energy Group), DVN (Devon Energy), GPOR (Gulfport Energy), MTDR (Matador Resources)
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 2 Democrats.
- Sep 30, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Sep 30, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
- Mar 25, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Hearings Held”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $210,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 26 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Mike Kennedy, the sponsor, reported $532,000 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Corporate Energy Buyers Association — $210,000 on 1 filing
- Vineyard Offshore LLC — $0 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 18, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 8, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 18, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Fossil fuel companies get veto over renewable projects on their leases” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr5639 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.