Geothermal exploration on public lands now exempt from environmental review
H.R. 5576 — Enhancing Geothermal Production on Federal Lands Act · Filed by Russ Fulcher (R-ID) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 26, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to streamline federal permitting for small-scale geothermal exploration projects on leased federal lands. It exempts these projects from full environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) if they meet specific size and duration thresholds (wells under 13 3/8 inches diameter, less than 8 acres of surface disturbance, completed within 180 days, restored within 3 years). Lease holders must give 30 days' notice to the Secretary before drilling. The bill benefits geothermal companies and developers by reducing regulatory delays and compliance costs for exploratory drilling.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a categorical exemption from environmental review (NEPA major-action status) for small geothermal exploration projects. This is a classic regulatory streamlining device—reducing procedural requirements to accelerate permitting. The bill does not subsidize or directly fund geothermal development; it removes a procedural gate.
What the text implies
- The exemption applies to all geothermal exploration projects meeting the size/duration thresholds, not just pilot or demonstration projects, potentially affecting large numbers of wells across federal lands with no individual NEPA review.
- The 8-acre surface-disturbance cap and 180-day completion window are narrow, but the bill does not define 'surface disturbance' or clarify how it is measured, creating potential for interpretation disputes and underreporting.
- Restoration 'to approximately the condition that existed' is vague and may be difficult to enforce; the 3-year restoration window is short for arid or sensitive ecosystems.
- The bill references categorical exclusions adopted by BLM from Navy and Forest Service precedents, but does not restate those exclusions in this text—the actual scope of the exemption depends on how those prior exclusions are defined and applied.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens lose procedural transparency and environmental review rights for geothermal exploration on federal lands. While geothermal energy is a renewable resource with potential climate benefits, the bill eliminates mandatory NEPA review—a core public-participation mechanism—for projects on public lands, shifting the balance toward developer speed over public oversight. The 30-day notice requirement is minimal and does not restore the lost review process.
Who stands to gain
- geothermal energy developers and operators
- geothermal lease holders
- drilling contractors and service providers
Named in the bill
Geothermal Steam Act of 1970, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Navy, U.S. Forest Service, Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (Public Law 118–5)
Where it stands
3 cosponsors: 3 Republicans.
- Sep 26, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Sep 26, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
- Dec 16, 2025 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Hearings Held”
- Mar 5, 2026 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Mar 5, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 16”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
4 lobbying clients named this bill on 7 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $4,195,375 in lobbying spend. A filing names 10 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 72% of bills with at least one filing.
Russ Fulcher, the sponsor, reported $350,070 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Fervo Energy Company — $2,220,000 on 4 filings
- Chevron U.S.A. Inc. — $1,670,000 on 1 filing
- Corporate Energy Buyers Association — $210,000 on 1 filing
- Zanskar Geothermal & Minerals, Inc. — $95,375 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 21, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,046 characters) on Apr 14, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 21, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Geothermal exploration on public lands now exempt from environmental review” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr5576 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.