Congress moves to strip Fed's legal duty to fight unemployment
H.R. 5396 — Price Stability Act of 2025 · Filed by J. Hill (R-AR) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 16, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill removes the Federal Reserve's legal mandate to pursue maximum employment alongside price stability. Currently, the Fed is required by law to balance two goals: keeping prices stable AND keeping unemployment low. This bill deletes the employment goal, leaving only price stability. The change would shift Fed policy toward prioritizing inflation control over job creation.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a single statutory amendment that removes one half of a dual mandate. It is straightforward in text but consequential in effect: it rebalances the Fed's legal obligations away from employment toward price stability alone.
What the text implies
- Removal of the employment mandate does not prevent the Fed from considering employment in practice, but it eliminates the legal requirement and the political/accountability pressure to do so. Future Fed chairs will have weaker statutory grounds to defend employment-focused policies.
- The change may increase the Fed's tolerance for higher unemployment as a tool to fight inflation, since the statutory obligation to balance the two goals is gone. This could shift the Fed's policy reaction function in recessions or periods of wage pressure.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
creditors and savers (benefit from inflation control prioritized over employment); financial institutions (reduced pressure for accommodative monetary policy)