Federal health grants now favor programs with labor, employer partnerships
H.R. 5384 — MORE Act · Filed by Dwight Evans (D-PA) · Introduced Sep 16, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Social Security Act to require the federal government to prioritize grant applications for health profession training programs that partner with state/local government agencies, educational institutions, workforce boards, and healthcare employers or labor unions. Applicants with these types of partnerships get preference in receiving federal health profession opportunity grants.
Why we flagged it
The bill uses federal grant preference as a policy lever to encourage health profession training programs to build partnerships with government, educational, and employer entities. This is a standard workforce-development mechanism designed to improve training outcomes and labor-market alignment.
What the text implies
- Programs without existing partnerships may face reduced competitiveness for federal funding, potentially disadvantaging smaller or rural training institutions that lack established networks.
- The preference mechanism may indirectly favor larger, well-resourced institutions that can more easily establish and maintain multiple partnership categories.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
health profession training institutions with established partnerships; workforce development boards; labor unions and labor-management organizations