Federal health grants now favor programs with labor, employer partnerships
H.R. 5384 — MORE Act · Filed by Dwight Evans (D-PA) · Introduced Sep 16, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Social Security Act to require the federal government to prioritize grant applications for health profession training programs that partner with state/local government agencies, educational institutions, workforce boards, and healthcare employers or labor unions. Applicants with these types of partnerships get preference in receiving federal health profession opportunity grants.
Why we flagged it
The bill uses federal grant preference as a policy lever to encourage health profession training programs to build partnerships with government, educational, and employer entities. This is a standard workforce-development mechanism designed to improve training outcomes and labor-market alignment.
What the text implies
- Programs without existing partnerships may face reduced competitiveness for federal funding, potentially disadvantaging smaller or rural training institutions that lack established networks.
- The preference mechanism may indirectly favor larger, well-resourced institutions that can more easily establish and maintain multiple partnership categories.
- Labor union and labor-management partnership preference may increase training costs or administrative burden for programs in non-union sectors or regions.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill incentivizes health profession training programs to partner with government agencies, educational institutions, and employers, which typically improves training quality, job placement, and alignment with workforce needs. Citizens benefit through better-trained health professionals and stronger pathways from training to employment.
Who stands to gain
- health profession training institutions with established partnerships
- workforce development boards
- labor unions and labor-management organizations
- healthcare employers
Named in the bill
Social Security Act Section 2008, Secretary of Health and Human Services, state and local government agencies, institutions of higher education, apprenticeship programs, workforce development boards, Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Section 107, health care employers, labor unions
Where it stands
- Sep 16, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Sep 16, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,269 characters) on Aug 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal health grants now favor programs with labor, employer partnerships” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr5384 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.