Congress mandates rigorous tracking of federal health training grants
H.R. 5376 — Impacts and Outcomes for Health Career Training Act · Filed by Brad Schneider (D-IL) · Introduced Sep 16, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Social Security Act to require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to study the effects of health profession opportunity grant demonstration projects on participants' employment and earnings over the short, medium, and long term. It mandates that at least 4 percent of annual funding for these grants be dedicated to rigorous evaluation and study, ensuring taxpayer money spent on these training programs is tracked and measured for effectiveness.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is to require rigorous, evidence-based evaluation of existing federal health profession training grants. It is a transparency and accountability measure, not a funding increase or policy change to the underlying program.
What the text implies
- The 4% evaluation floor may reduce direct grant funding available to training programs in the short term, though the intent is to improve long-term program quality and reduce waste.
- Mandatory study of 'short-, medium-, and long-term' outcomes creates ongoing data collection obligations that may require new HHS infrastructure or contractor support.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
health profession training programs (indirect benefit via improved program design based on evaluatio; evaluation contractors or research institutions (direct benefit from 4% funding allocation)