QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress creates $500B infrastructure bank with federal backstop for losses

H.R. 5356 — National Infrastructure Bank Act of 2025 · Filed by Danny Davis (D-IL) · 63 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 15, 2025 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
28/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Infrastructure Finance Institution

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

HR 5356 creates a new National Infrastructure Bank capitalized with up to $500 billion (raised from Treasury securities, municipal bonds, and cash) to provide long-term loans and financing for major infrastructure projects in transportation, energy, environment, telecommunications, and community development. The Bank operates as a federally-chartered deposit-taking institution with a 25-member Board appointed by the President, establishes regional planning groups to identify infrastructure priorities, and prioritizes projects serving disadvantaged communities, rural areas, and high-unemployment regions. Preferred shareholders (including the U.S. Treasury) receive guaranteed dividends; the Bank may borrow up to $5 trillion in loans outstanding and is backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government for losses exceeding its loan-loss reserves.

Why we flagged it

This bill establishes a federally-chartered National Infrastructure Bank with $500B in capital authority, designed to provide long-term financing for transportation, energy, environmental, telecommunications, and community development projects. It functions as a development bank with explicit public-interest criteria and regional planning mandates.

What the text implies

  • The Bank's $5 trillion loan limit and ability to accept deposits creates a quasi-central banking function that may compete with or complement Federal Reserve operations, with unclear coordination mechanisms.
  • Regional economic accelerator planning groups may concentrate infrastructure investment in economically connected 'megaregions,' potentially widening disparities between connected and isolated rural areas despite stated inclusion goals.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Infrastructure contractors and engineering firms; Construction materials manufacturers (steel, iron, cement); Transportation and logistics companies

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record