Congress creates $500B infrastructure bank with federal backstop for losses
H.R. 5356 — National Infrastructure Bank Act of 2025 · Filed by Danny Davis (D-IL) · 63 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 15, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
HR 5356 creates a new National Infrastructure Bank capitalized with up to $500 billion (raised from Treasury securities, municipal bonds, and cash) to provide long-term loans and financing for major infrastructure projects in transportation, energy, environment, telecommunications, and community development. The Bank operates as a federally-chartered deposit-taking institution with a 25-member Board appointed by the President, establishes regional planning groups to identify infrastructure priorities, and prioritizes projects serving disadvantaged communities, rural areas, and high-unemployment regions. Preferred shareholders (including the U.S. Treasury) receive guaranteed dividends; the Bank may borrow up to $5 trillion in loans outstanding and is backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government for losses exceeding its loan-loss reserves.
Why we flagged it
This bill establishes a federally-chartered National Infrastructure Bank with $500B in capital authority, designed to provide long-term financing for transportation, energy, environmental, telecommunications, and community development projects. It functions as a development bank with explicit public-interest criteria and regional planning mandates.
What the text implies
- The Bank's $5 trillion loan limit and ability to accept deposits creates a quasi-central banking function that may compete with or complement Federal Reserve operations, with unclear coordination mechanisms.
- Regional economic accelerator planning groups may concentrate infrastructure investment in economically connected 'megaregions,' potentially widening disparities between connected and isolated rural areas despite stated inclusion goals.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Infrastructure contractors and engineering firms; Construction materials manufacturers (steel, iron, cement); Transportation and logistics companies