QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress freezes mortgage fees, blocking Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac updates

H.R. 53 — Responsible Borrower Protection Act of 2025 · Filed by Andy Biggs (R-AZ) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 3, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Mortgage Fee Freeze / Fannie Mae & Freddie…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill blocks the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from implementing fee changes announced in January 2023 that adjusted how they price credit risk into mortgage fees. The bill voids those fee changes and the guidance documents that created them, but explicitly permits the companies to continue using risk-based pricing (charging different fees based on borrower credit quality). The net effect is to freeze mortgage fees at pre-2023 levels for borrowers, preventing what the bill's sponsors view as unfair fee increases.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a prohibition on implementing a specific fee-pricing framework, which freezes mortgage fees at pre-2023 levels. This is a direct revenue restriction on two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), not a deregulation or a consumer protection in the traditional sense — it is a mandate to preserve an older fee structure.

What the text implies

  • If Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac cannot raise fees to reflect updated credit-risk models, they may reduce lending capacity, tighten underwriting standards, or raise rates on other loan products to offset lost revenue.
  • The bill preserves risk-based pricing but freezes the framework used to calculate it, creating potential misalignment between actual credit risk and fees charged — borrowers with genuinely higher risk may be underpriced relative to the GSEs' loss exposure.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

mortgage borrowers (lower fees, especially those with lower credit scores); real estate agents and home builders (lower borrowing costs may support demand)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record