Fed's climate-risk oversight stripped in transparency bill
H.R. 5270 — Stress Testing Accountability and Transparency Act · Filed by Bill Huizenga (R-MI) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 10, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Federal Reserve to publish the specific models, assumptions, and scenarios it uses to stress-test large banks and financial companies, and to make those methodologies transparent through formal rulemaking. It also prohibits the Fed from conducting climate-related stress tests and mandates a GAO audit every three years to assess whether stress tests actually measure financial stability.
Why we flagged it
The bill's primary mechanism is transparency and accountability (requiring Fed rulemaking and public disclosure of stress-test methodologies), but it carries a substantive constraint: a prohibition on climate-related stress testing that narrows the Fed's supervisory toolkit independent of the transparency goal.
- Prohibition on climate-related stress testing (Section 3) is substantively unrelated to transparency/accountability mandate; it is a deregulatory rider.
What the text implies
- The climate-stress-test prohibition may prevent the Fed from assessing whether large financial institutions face material losses from climate-related asset devaluation, stranding, or liability—a gap that could leave systemic risk unmonitored.
- Requiring the Fed to disclose stress-test scenarios 60 days in advance may allow sophisticated market participants to front-run or game the tests, potentially reducing their effectiveness as a safety measure.
- The 'no double-count' provision (Section 2) could reduce capital buffers if the Fed has been conservatively stacking requirements; the net effect on bank safety is unclear without seeing the Fed's current methodology.
- Mandating GAO audits every 3 years creates a new oversight layer but does not grant Congress or the public power to override Fed methodology—it is accountability theater unless audit findings trigger legislative action.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill increases transparency and public accountability over Fed stress-testing—a genuine civic benefit—but simultaneously strips the Fed of a tool (climate-risk stress testing) that may be material to assessing systemic financial risk from climate exposure, potentially weakening financial stability oversight that protects depositors and the broader economy.
Who stands to gain
- large bank holding companies and nonbank financial companies subject to stress testing (AIG, Prudent
- financial institutions with climate-exposed assets or liabilities
Named in the bill
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Financial Stability Act of 2010 (Section 165), Comptroller General (GAO), covered companies (bank holding companies, nonbank financial companies), AIG, Prudential (PRU), Principal Financial Group (PFG), Fiserv (FBK), FMAO
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 2 Republicans.
- Sep 10, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Sep 10, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”
- Sep 16, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Sep 16, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 28 - 24”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $54,660,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 254 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Bill Huizenga, the sponsor, reported $1,647,709 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. — $54,660,000 on 3 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,350 characters) on Jul 6, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Fed's climate-risk oversight stripped in transparency bill” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr5270 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.