QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

State Department gets new economic power—with minimal oversight built in

H.R. 5248 — PROFIT Act of 2026 · Filed by Young Kim (R-CA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 10, 2025 · Passed chamber

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
State Department Economic Reorganization

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill reorganizes the State Department to elevate economic policy as a core national security function. It creates new positions—a Chief Economist, an Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs, an Assistant Secretary for Energy Security and Diplomacy, and an Assistant Secretary for Water, Environment, and Space Affairs—and establishes corresponding bureaus. It also creates an Office of Subnational Diplomacy to coordinate with U.S. state and local governments on foreign investment and countering foreign influence. The bill shifts staffing toward civil service economists and policy experts, grants the Chief Economist's office broad contracting flexibility, and requires annual reporting on U.S. international economic strategy.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is structural reorganization of the State Department to elevate economic and energy security as foreign policy priorities. It creates new positions, bureaus, and reporting requirements rather than enacting substantive policy changes. The mechanism is administrative and institutional, not legislative in the traditional sense.

What the text implies

  • The Chief Economist's office receives 'maximum contracting flexibility' including personal services contracting and 'other transaction authority'—mechanisms that can bypass standard procurement rules and create opaque spending channels with minimal congressional oversight.
  • The bill empowers the Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs to assist US companies in 'winning contracts in foreign markets' and 'promoting international commercial projects that advance national security interests, regardless of domestic content thresholds'—language that may subordinate labor and environmental standards to corporate market access.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

US energy companies (oil, gas, renewables) seeking market access abroad; US commercial space industry (satellite, launch, infrastructure providers); US defense and technology contractors (through energy security and space coordination)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record