QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress expands intelligence data collection while adding modest workforce protections

H.R. 5167 — Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 · Filed by Rick Crawford (R-AR) · Introduced Sep 8, 2025 · Reported out

55%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
2
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
High concernIntelligence Authorization with Workforce…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill authorizes fiscal year 2026 appropriations for U.S. intelligence agencies and establishes new oversight, workforce, and operational requirements. Key provisions include: mandating SecDef to track commercial vendors supporting clandestine DoD activities; disestablishing advisory boards for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and National Reconnaissance Office; expanding commercial imagery procurement; requiring FBI to notify Congress within 5 days of counterintelligence investigations into federal candidates and officeholders; establishing open-source intelligence coordination and oversight; prohibiting intelligence personnel from being required to engage in political or ideological activism as a condition of employment; and directing intelligence assessments of China's economic and technological power relative to the U.S.

Why we flagged it

The bill's primary function is to authorize intelligence appropriations and establish new operational frameworks for commercial vendor oversight, open-source intelligence coordination, and China-focused assessments. Secondary but significant provisions address workforce fairness (prohibiting political activism requirements) and democratic accountability (FBI notification of investigations into federal candidates). The bill is not primarily a deregulation or corporate giveaway, but rather a mixed

  • Sections 702–704 (prohibition on political/ideological activism, merit-based personnel decisions, equal treatment in recruitment) are substantively unrelated to intelligence appropriations or operational oversight—they are personnel policy amendments.
  • Section 705 (treatment of CIA service as active-duty service for VA benefits) is a benefits/entitlements amendment unrelated to intelligence authorization or appropriations.

What the text implies

  • Section 430f (commercial vendor tracking for clandestine activities) creates a centralized database of private contractors supporting covert DoD operations, but the SecDef may exclude information from this capability on national security grounds with only post-hoc congressional notification—creating a potential loophole where sensitive vendor relationships remain opaque.
  • Open-source intelligence provisions (Sections 601–611) authorize intelligence agencies to acquire and retain 'commercially available information' (including bulk data, APIs, and software licenses) with minimal public disclosure of spending or scope; quarterly briefings to Congress are required but not public.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Commercial remote sensing companies (Section 514 expands procurement authority); Commercial data vendors and analytics firms (Sections 601–611 authorize acquisition of commercially; Defense contractors providing clandestine support services (Section 430f creates oversight framework

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record