QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Military training lands locked up for 25 more years across Alaska, New Mexico, California

H.R. 5131 — Public Lands Military Readiness Act of 2025 · Filed by Nicholas Begich (R-AK) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Sep 4, 2025 · Passed chamber

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Military Land Withdrawal Extension

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill extends military land withdrawals in Alaska, New Mexico, and California for 25 additional years (to 2051) and corrects acreage descriptions in existing military withdrawal statutes. The Yukon Training Area, Donnelly Training Areas, McGregor Range, and Fort Irwin military lands remain off-limits to civilian use, mining, and development, benefiting military training operations and readiness.

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole operative function is to extend existing military land withdrawals by 25 years and correct technical acreage descriptions. It is a straightforward administrative extension of prior military readiness legislation.

What the text implies

  • Extends military control over approximately 723,000+ acres of public land through 2051, foreclosing civilian development, mining, and recreation on those lands for a quarter-century.
  • Acreage corrections (McGregor Range reduced from 608,385 to 605,401 acres; Fort Irwin increased from 110,000 to 117,710 acres) suggest prior surveys were inaccurate — the net effect is a modest increase in withdrawn acreage.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Citizens retain no new rights; military training lands remain withdrawn from public use for 25 more years. However, the bill serves a legitimate national defense purpose (military readiness and training), and the lands were already withdrawn — this is a continuation, not a new restriction.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record