Congress nullifies Arctic and Atlantic protections, opens federal waters to oil drilling
H.R. 513 — Offshore Lands Authorities Act of 2025 · Filed by Clay Higgins (R-LA) · 25 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 16, 2025 · Hearing held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill nullifies eight recent presidential withdrawals of offshore land from oil and gas leasing (in the Arctic, Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Northern Bering Sea) and imposes new limits on future presidential withdrawals: no single withdrawal may exceed 150,000 acres or last longer than 20 years, and no president may withdraw more than 500,000 acres total without congressional approval. The bill also requires the president to conduct resource assessments and submit reports to Congress before withdrawing land, and establishes a fast-track congressional disapproval process allowing either chamber to block future withdrawals with a simple majority vote.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to nullify environmental protections (presidential withdrawals) and replace them with weaker procedural constraints that ultimately facilitate oil and gas leasing on federal offshore lands. The procedural amendments appear to constrain presidential power but are designed to shift authority to Congress and industry, not to protect the public interest.
What the text implies
- The 150,000-acre cap per withdrawal and 20-year duration limit appear restrictive but are actually permissive: they allow repeated withdrawals of leasing protections, enabling incremental opening of sensitive areas without triggering the 500,000-acre cumulative cap.
- The congressional disapproval procedure (requiring a joint resolution to block a withdrawal) inverts the default: instead of requiring congressional approval to open new areas, it requires congressional action to keep them closed—a procedural advantage to energy development.
- Nullifying the January 6, 2025 withdrawal (item 7) immediately reopens Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic, and Pacific areas that were just protected days before the bill's introduction, suggesting coordination with industry timing.
- The bill's requirement for 'mineral resource assessments' and 'economic and energy value' reports may be used to justify future withdrawals of protections by framing energy development as economically necessary.
- Integration with the 5-year oil and gas leasing program (subsection 5) locks future withdrawals into existing lease schedules, preventing the president from protecting areas once they enter the leasing pipeline.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens lose environmental and climate protections: the bill reopens sensitive Arctic and marine ecosystems to oil and gas leasing, increasing extraction risk and carbon emissions. While the bill imposes procedural constraints on future presidential withdrawals, those constraints are weaker than the current executive authority and are designed to facilitate, not prevent, energy development. The primary beneficiaries are oil and gas companies and energy producers; the primary costs fall
Who stands to gain
- oil and gas exploration and production companies
- offshore drilling contractors
- energy infrastructure developers
- fossil fuel industry suppliers
Named in the bill
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSL), Arctic (Chukchi Sea, Beaufort Sea, Northern Bering Sea), Atlantic Coast offshore areas, Gulf of Mexico, Pacific offshore areas, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Agriculture, House Committee on Natural Resources, House Committee on Agriculture, House Committee on Armed Services — and 8 more
Where it stands
25 cosponsors: 25 Republicans.
- Jan 16, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 16, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Rules and House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be…”
- May 20, 2025 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Hearings Held”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (11,687 characters) on Aug 20, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress nullifies Arctic and Atlantic protections, opens federal waters to oil drilling” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr513 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.