QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Feds gain power to destroy your drone without a warrant—and intercept its signals.

H.R. 5061 — Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act · Filed by Andrew Garbarino (R-NY) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Aug 29, 2025 · Reported out

62%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernCounter-Drone Authority & Surveillance…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill authorizes the FAA, DHS, and DOJ to detect, track, seize, disable, or destroy unmanned aircraft systems (drones) that pose threats to aviation safety or national security. It creates a federal approval process for counter-UAS equipment, establishes training standards for operators, and allows state and local law enforcement to deploy approved counter-drone systems at airports and special events under federal oversight. The bill includes safeguards requiring FAA coordination to prevent harm to civilian aviation, privacy protections for intercepted communications, and congressional briefings on all counter-UAS actions.

Why we flagged it

The bill's primary function is to grant federal and state law enforcement broad authority to detect, track, and destroy unmanned aircraft systems, coupled with expanded surveillance powers (warrantless interception of drone communications) and a new federal approval bureaucracy for counter-UAS equipment.

What the text implies

  • Warrantless interception of drone communications is authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 2511 exemption, creating a precedent for surveillance without traditional wiretap warrants or consent.
  • The 90-day retention window for intercepted communications may be extended indefinitely if DOJ claims investigative necessity, with minimal judicial oversight or public disclosure.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. counter-UAS equipment manufacturers (e.g., Dedrone, Airspace Intelligence, Battelle); Defense contractors with counter-drone capabilities; Airport operators and security service providers

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record