Military academies forced to ditch holistic review for test-score rankings
H.R. 5046 — Restoring Merit in the Military Service Academies Act · Filed by Nancy Mace (R-SC) · Introduced Aug 26, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill rewrites admissions rules for the three major U.S. military service academies (West Point, Annapolis, Air Force Academy) to mandate that admissions decisions be based primarily on a standardized 'composite score' weighted heavily toward test scores (45% minimum) and academic metrics (60% minimum overall), with subjective factors capped at 10%. It explicitly prohibits consideration of race, sex, color, ethnicity, national origin, or religion in admissions decisions, and requires detailed annual reporting on all waivers and the outcomes of admitted cadets.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to restructure how the three service academies select cadets and midshipmen, shifting from a holistic review model to a metrics-driven composite-score system. This is a direct policy change to federal admissions law, not a tax provision, appropriation, or commemorative act.
What the text implies
- Standardized test scores become the dominant factor (45% minimum of composite score), which may advantage students with access to test prep and disadvantage first-generation or lower-income applicants despite the bill's race-neutral framing.
- The 10% cap on subjective factors eliminates or severely constrains the academies' ability to weigh leadership demonstrated in adversity, character references, or non-academic resilience—traits historically central to officer selection.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
standardized test providers (College Board, ACT Inc.); test-prep companies