Congress targets CEO pay excess with tax penalties and procurement leverage
H.R. 5019 — CEO Accountability and Responsibility Act · Filed by Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Aug 22, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill imposes a progressive tax penalty on publicly traded corporations based on their CEO-to-median-employee pay ratio: companies with ratios above 100:1 face tax rate increases of 0.5 to 3 percentage points, with steeper penalties for higher ratios. It also penalizes companies that cut U.S. workers while expanding contractors or foreign staff, and gives federal procurement preference to companies with pay ratios below 50:1.
Why we flagged it
The bill uses tax code amendments and procurement policy to penalize extreme pay ratios and incentivize domestic employment, functioning as a structural inequality-reduction tool rather than a simple tax or spending measure.
What the text implies
- Tax increases may be passed to consumers via higher prices or to workers via wage suppression, partially offsetting the intended inequality reduction.
- The 50% penalty for replacing U.S. workers with contractors/foreign staff may incentivize companies to reclassify or restructure employment relationships to avoid the trigger.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
companies with lower pay ratios (competitive advantage in federal procurement); workers at companies incentivized to raise median wages; federal government (increased tax revenue from high-ratio corporations)