QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal ban on commercial dog racing targets dying industry with documented cruelty

H.R. 5017 — Greyhound Protection Act of 2025 · Filed by Salud Carbajal (D-CA) · 30 cosponsors · Introduced Aug 22, 2025 · Referred to committee

92%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Animal Welfare Protection

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the Animal Welfare Act to make commercial greyhound racing, live lure training (using live animals as bait), and open field coursing (hunting events) federal crimes, effective October 1, 2027. It prohibits knowingly engaging in these activities when greyhounds move across state lines or when betting occurs, and bars the sale, transport, or possession of greyhounds for these purposes. Violators face up to 7 years in prison and fines. The bill is framed around documented animal cruelty—injuries, confinement, drug use, and the use of live prey animals—and notes that the industry is already nearly extinct (only 2 tracks remain in the U.S., down from 60 twenty-five years ago).

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole operative mechanism is a criminal prohibition on commercial greyhound racing, live lure training, and open field coursing, grounded in documented animal cruelty. It is a straightforward animal-protection statute with no hidden riders or private carve-outs.

What the text implies

  • The October 1, 2027 effective date gives the remaining 2 West Virginia tracks 2+ years to wind down operations, potentially allowing orderly closure rather than immediate disruption.
  • The bill's definition of 'commercial greyhound racing' hinges on 'betting or wagering'—a private, non-commercial greyhound race with no wagering would not be prohibited, though the bill's language on 'live lure training' and 'open field coursing' applies regardless of wagering.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

animal welfare organizations (enforcement, litigation, rescue operations); state governments (reduced regulatory burden and subsidy costs)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record