QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress demands Pentagon threat assessment on violent antisemitism

H.R. 5011 — Violent Antisemitism Threat Assessment Act · Filed by Eugene Vindman (D-VA) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Aug 19, 2025 · Referred to committee

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Threat Assessment Reporting Requirement

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress by March 20, 2026, analyzing violent antisemitism as part of transnational extremist movements. The report must cover antisemitic ideologies, documented violent acts motivated by antisemitism, propaganda spreading these ideologies, and the threat such violence poses to U.S. citizens, military personnel, and American interests abroad. No new agency, funding, or enforcement mechanism is created.

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole operative mechanism is a directive to the Secretary of Defense to produce and deliver a factual report on a specific national security threat. It is a transparency and accountability measure, not a regulatory, appropriations, or enforcement action.

What the text implies

  • Report may inform future policy, enforcement priorities, or resource allocation by DoD and intelligence agencies, though the bill itself creates no such mandate.
  • Public release of threat assessment could influence congressional debate on extremism, counterterrorism strategy, and international coordination on antisemitism.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who it affects

The bill creates transparency and accountability by requiring the federal government to formally assess and document a documented security threat (violent antisemitism) and report findings to Congress and the public record. Citizens gain visibility into how the executive branch understands and prioritizes this threat; no rights are restricted, no costs are imposed, and no private parties are shielded from liability.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record