Federal housing funds cut off to cities serving immigrants—even for citizens.
H.R. 50 — KAMALA Act · Filed by Andy Biggs (R-AZ) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 3, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits federal housing grants under the Housing and Community Development Act from being used to help people who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents. It also bars states, cities, and tribes from receiving any housing grants if they operate ANY housing program that assists non-citizens, even with non-federal funds. The effect is to cut off federal housing money to entire jurisdictions that serve mixed populations.
Why we flagged it
The operative mechanism restricts federal housing grants to jurisdictions based on their immigration-assistance policies, but the bill's short title is an acronym spelling the sitting Vice President's first name, which signals political messaging rather than neutral policy drafting.
What the text implies
- Section 103(b) creates a blanket prohibition: if a jurisdiction operates ANY housing or community development program assisting non-citizens (even with state/local funds), it loses ALL federal section 106 grants. This is a funding cliff unrelated to the specific grant's use.
- The bill does not distinguish between federal and non-federal funds in the triggering condition. A city that uses its own money to assist non-citizens in housing loses federal money for citizens' housing.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Citizens in jurisdictions that serve non-citizens lose access to federal housing grants, even if they themselves are citizens or lawful residents. The all-or-nothing funding bar means a city cannot receive federal housing money if it operates any program assisting non-citizens, regardless of whether federal funds are used for that program.