QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress funds Lyme disease research the easy way: a stamp

H.R. 4981 — Stamp Out Lyme Disease Act · Filed by Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) · 13 cosponsors · Introduced Aug 15, 2025 · Referred to committee

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Health Fundraising Mechanism

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill authorizes the U.S. Postal Service to issue a special 'semipostal' stamp dedicated to Lyme disease research. A semipostal stamp costs slightly more than a regular stamp; the extra revenue goes directly to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) for Lyme disease and tick-borne illness research. The stamp must be available for at least 6 years, and the research funding it generates cannot be used to reduce NIAID's regular congressional appropriations.

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole function is to establish a voluntary, opt-in revenue stream for Lyme disease research via a commemorative postal stamp. It is a straightforward public-health funding tool with no hidden provisions or narrow beneficiaries.

What the text implies

  • The bill's effectiveness depends entirely on voluntary consumer participation; if uptake is low, research funding may be minimal despite good intent.
  • The 6-year minimum duration creates a long-term commitment to a single disease focus, which may crowd out other tick-borne illnesses (e.g., Rocky Mountain spotted fever, babesiosis) unless NIAID allocates proceeds broadly.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who it affects

This bill creates a voluntary, low-friction funding mechanism for a serious public-health problem (Lyme disease affects ~476,000 Americans annually and costs the healthcare system up to $1.3 billion per year). Citizens who choose to buy the stamp contribute to research without any cost to taxpayers or reduction in existing medical funding.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record