QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal fossil fuel support now protected from climate screening

H.R. 4835 — Strategic Resources Non-discrimination Act · Filed by Andy Barr (R-KY) · Introduced Aug 1, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernFossil Fuel Industry Protection

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the Defense Production Act to prevent the President from denying federal financial support (loans, guarantees, purchases) to companies based solely on their involvement in fossil fuel exploration, development, or sale—except when the support is explicitly for energy production itself. It also carves out an exception for environmental protection in the Act's domestic energy supply authority.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is to prohibit the President from using energy-source discrimination as a criterion for awarding federal financial support under the Defense Production Act. This directly shields fossil fuel companies from being screened out of federal credit, loan guarantees, and procurement programs—a subsidy-by-access mechanism.

What the text implies

  • The 'other than for purposes of environmental protection' carve-out in Section 101(c)(1) is narrow and may not survive judicial scrutiny if the President frames climate/environmental criteria as environmental protection rather than energy-source discrimination—creating litigation risk and regulatory uncertainty.
  • The bill does not restrict the President's ability to deny support based on OTHER criteria (financial viability, national security, labor standards), so the practical effect depends on how narrowly courts interpret 'based on energy source' vs. correlated factors.
  • Federal credit programs (SBA loans, USDA rural development, DOE loan programs) may be forced to extend support to fossil fuel projects that would otherwise be screened for climate risk, shifting default/loss risk to taxpayers.
  • The exception 'other than for the production of energy' in Section 306 may create a loophole: fossil fuel companies could argue that infrastructure, transportation, or refining support is 'for the production of energy' and thus exempt from the non-discrimination rule.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill restricts the President's ability to condition federal financial support on climate or energy-transition criteria, effectively requiring taxpayer-backed credit and procurement to flow to fossil fuel companies on equal terms with clean-energy competitors. Citizens bear the fiscal and climate risk; fossil fuel firms gain guaranteed market access.

Who stands to gain

  • fossil fuel exploration and production companies
  • oil and gas refiners
  • coal mining and transportation firms
  • fossil fuel infrastructure developers

Named in the bill

Defense Production Act of 1950, Section 101(c)(1), Title III (Defense Production Act), Sections 301, 302, 303 (DPA), President (executive authority), fossil fuel industry

Where it stands

  • Aug 1, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Aug 1, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. Those filings disclosed $1,920,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 23 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.

Andy Barr, the sponsor, reported $2,160,072 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • American Petroleum Institute — $1,920,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jan 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (879 characters) on Aug 18, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jan 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Federal fossil fuel support now protected from climate screening” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr4835 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.