QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal grant program funds community mental health and resilience initiatives

H.R. 4744 — Community Mental Wellness and Resilience Act of 2025 · Filed by Paul Tonko (D-NY) · 9 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 23, 2025 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Health Grant Program

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a federal grant program to fund community-based mental health and resilience initiatives. The Department of Health and Human Services will award planning grants (up to $250,000) to nonprofits and community organizations to organize mental wellness networks, and larger program grants (up to $500,000/year for four years) to established networks to run prevention and community-building activities. At least 20% of funds must go to rural areas, and grantees must involve representatives from schools, youth groups, faith organizations, businesses, police, health professionals, and residents to develop evidence-based strategies for strengthening community mental health.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is straightforward: it establishes a federal grant mechanism to fund community mental health and resilience programs through HHS. This is routine public health legislation with clear civic purpose and no hidden mechanisms.

What the text implies

  • The requirement that resilience coordinating networks include representatives from at least 5 of 13 categories (including police, faith organizations, and businesses) may create tension between public health and law-enforcement or commercial interests in defining mental health priorities.
  • The emphasis on 'evidence-based, evidence-informed, promising-best, or indigenous practices' creates flexibility but may allow programs to vary significantly in rigor and outcomes, making comparative evaluation difficult.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

nonprofit organizations; community-based organizations; educational institutions

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record