QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates 15-day deportation deadline, compressing asylum rights

H.R. 4711 — REMOVE Act · Filed by Troy Nehls (R-TX) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 23, 2025 · Reported out

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
45/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernImmigration Enforcement Acceleration

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends immigration law to require the Attorney General to start removal proceedings immediately after ICE files a Notice to Appear with immigration court, and to complete all removal proceedings within 15 days of commencement. For aliens convicted of deportable offenses, proceedings must begin as soon as possible after conviction. The bill overrides existing procedural timelines and gives the Attorney General broad authority to issue regulations and guidance to meet the 15-day deadline.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a mandatory 15-day removal deadline and broad regulatory authority for the Attorney General to override existing procedural safeguards. This is functionally an enforcement-speed mandate, not a procedural clarification.

What the text implies

  • The 15-day deadline may render statutory asylum protections (INA § 208) practically inaccessible, since asylum adjudication typically requires more time for evidence gathering and legal representation.
  • The override of § 208(d)(5)(A) is buried in a bracketed '[NOTWITHSTANDING]' clause and is not explicitly named; readers must cross-reference the statute to understand what procedural rule is being suspended.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

The 15-day removal deadline severely compresses the time available for aliens to obtain legal counsel, prepare defenses, gather evidence, and exercise statutory rights (including asylum claims under § 208). Ordinary people facing removal—including asylum seekers and those with valid legal defenses—lose procedural protections and meaningful opportunity to be heard.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record