QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress bans Chinese property ownership, but may trap U.S. citizens in the net

H.R. 4706 — Protecting Our Farms and Homes from China Act · Filed by Mary Miller (R-IL) · 21 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 23, 2025 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Foreign Investment Restriction / National…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill prohibits Chinese entities and individuals affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party from acquiring, leasing, or owning agricultural land or residential real estate in the United States. Existing Chinese-owned properties must be divested within one year, with daily fines of $100 per acre for agricultural land and $1,000 per residential unit for non-compliance. The bill also voids non-compete agreements for employees of covered foreign entities and establishes enforcement offices in the Departments of Agriculture and Commerce.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a blanket prohibition on Chinese entity acquisition and ownership of U.S. agricultural and residential real estate, enforced through fines, forfeiture, and criminal penalties. This is a foreign-investment control measure framed as national security and agricultural sovereignty protection.

What the text implies

  • The $100/acre/day and $1,000/unit/day penalty structure creates exponential liability that may force rapid fire-sale divestment, potentially depressing property values and harming non-Chinese buyers seeking to acquire divested assets at distressed prices.
  • The bill's definition of 'covered foreign entity' includes any individual affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party or on the board of a covered entity, potentially capturing U.S. citizens with Chinese heritage or business ties, raising due-process and equal-protection concerns.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. agricultural producers (reduced foreign competition for land); U.S. real estate developers and domestic property investors (reduced foreign buyer competition); Department of Agriculture and Department of Commerce (expanded enforcement budgets and staffing)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record