QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates hearing-device coverage in private insurance plans

H.R. 4606 — Ally’s Act · Filed by Joe Neguse (D-CO) · 111 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 22, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Hearing Care Coverage Mandate

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires private health insurance plans (group and individual) to cover hearing devices and related services for people with hearing loss, including cochlear implants, bone-conduction implants, maintenance, repairs, upgrades every 5 years, surgery, and rehabilitation. Insurance plans cannot impose higher cost-sharing or stricter limits on hearing coverage than they do for other medical benefits, and cannot deny coverage based on medical-necessity reviews if a doctor or audiologist determines the device is medically necessary.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is a straightforward insurance coverage requirement — it mandates that private health plans cover hearing devices and related services without discriminatory cost-sharing or medical-necessity denials. This is a consumer-protection / healthcare-access measure, not a tax provision, subsidy, or deregulation.

What the text implies

  • The bill applies to both group and individual health insurance, meaning ACA marketplace plans and employer-sponsored plans must comply, potentially increasing premiums across the insured population to fund hearing-device coverage.
  • The 5-year upgrade/replacement cycle creates recurring revenue for hearing-device manufacturers and audiologists, as plans must cover new devices regularly rather than one-time purchases.
  • The prohibition on medical-necessity review removes insurers' ability to deny coverage based on clinical judgment, shifting gatekeeping authority entirely to treating physicians and audiologists — may increase utilization and costs.
  • Grandfathered health plans (those that existed before the ACA) are explicitly brought under this mandate, expanding the reach beyond typical ACA-compliant plans.
  • The bill does not cap device costs, copays, or deductibles — it only requires that hearing coverage be treated no worse than other medical benefits, leaving room for high out-of-pocket costs if the plan's overall cost-sharing is high.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Ordinary people with hearing loss gain access to expensive hearing devices and related care that many plans currently exclude or severely limit. The mandate eliminates discriminatory cost-sharing and medical-necessity denials, shifting costs from patients to insurers and the broader insured population. The public benefit (expanded access to hearing care) outweighs the cost (modest premium increases across the insured base).

Who stands to gain

  • hearing-device manufacturers (cochlear implant, bone-conduction implant makers)
  • audiologists and hearing-care providers
  • audiology clinics and surgical centers
  • medical device distributors

Named in the bill

Public Health Service Act (PHSA), Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), Internal Revenue Code (IRC), Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Cochlear Limited, MED-EL, Sonova, GN Store Nord, Oticon, Starkey Hearing Technologies

Where it stands

111 cosponsors: 90 Democrats, 21 Republicans.

  • Jul 22, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Jul 22, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means and House Committee on Education and Workforce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

3 lobbying clients named this bill on 5 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,076,331 in lobbying spend. A filing names 33 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.

Joe Neguse, the sponsor, reported $1,076,229 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • American Speech-language-hearing Association — $680,000 on 2 filings
  • American Academy of Otolaryngology-head and Neck Surgery — $286,331 on 1 filing
  • Hearing Industries Association — $110,000 on 2 filings

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (11,141 characters) on Aug 14, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Congress mandates hearing-device coverage in private insurance plans” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr4606 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.