Federal mortgage insurance for backyard apartments—but no guardrails against investor speculation
H.R. 4568 — Supporting Upgraded Property Projects and Lending for Yards (SUPPLY) Act · Filed by Sam Liccardo (D-CA) · 46 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 21, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a federal insurance program for second mortgages used to finance accessory dwelling units (ADUs)—small residential units added to single-family homes. The government will insure these loans up to 30% of a home's value (or up to 100% of projected post-construction value if rental income is counted), and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy and resell these insured loans. The goal is to make it cheaper and easier for homeowners to build ADUs, which could increase housing supply.
Why we flagged it
The bill expands federal mortgage insurance and secondary-market purchasing authority to a new loan category (ADU second mortgages). It is fundamentally a financial-sector enablement measure disguised as a housing-supply bill.
What the text implies
- Federal insurance on ADU loans may incentivize speculative construction of rental units rather than owner-occupied housing, shifting the subsidy toward investor-landlords rather than homeowners seeking to increase their own property value.
- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securitization of these loans creates a new asset class that could concentrate housing-finance risk in government-sponsored enterprises, potentially increasing taxpayer exposure if ADU loan defaults spike.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
mortgage lenders and banks; Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; mortgage-backed securities investors