QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal backstop for property insurers shifts catastrophe risk to taxpayers

H.R. 4504 — INSURE Act · Filed by Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 17, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
28/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernFederal Reinsurance Subsidy for Property…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the Treasury Secretary to establish a federal reinsurance program that backs up private property insurers when they face catastrophic losses from wind, hurricanes, wildfires, storms, floods, and eventually earthquakes. Participating insurers pay premiums into a federal fund; when their losses exceed a threshold (capped at 40% of their probable maximum loss), the federal government covers the excess. The program phases in over 4–8 years, requires insurers to offer loss-prevention partnerships with policyholders, and creates an advisory committee with consumer advocates, state regulators, and federal agencies to oversee design and data collection.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a federal fund that reimburses private insurers for catastrophic losses above a threshold, effectively socializing tail risk while allowing insurers to retain premium revenue and control underwriting. This is a direct subsidy to the insurance industry, not a consumer protection or market-stabilization measure in the traditional sense.

What the text implies

  • The federal fund is backed by Treasury notes and bonds guaranteed by the US government, meaning taxpayers ultimately bear catastrophic losses; if the fund is depleted, the federal government must borrow to cover insurer payouts.
  • The loss-prevention partnership requirement and multi-year policy pilot allow insurers to condition coverage on policyholders making capital improvements (e.g., roof hardening, flood mitigation), which may exclude renters, low-income homeowners, and those without access to credit.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Primary property insurers (admitted and non-admitted); Reinsurance companies (as the federal program reduces their exposure); Mortgage lenders and banks (stabilized insurance markets reduce lending risk)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record