Hospitals must alert organ agencies faster—but rural broadband gaps may leave some behind.
H.R. 4470 — Removing Burdens From Organ Donation Act · Filed by Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 16, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires Medicare and Medicaid hospitals to automatically notify organ procurement agencies when a patient dies or is dying, and to give those agencies electronic access to the patient's health records in real time. Hospitals get a 2-year grace period to comply, and can seek exemptions for hardship (rural broadband gaps, cybersecurity attacks, disasters). The bill aims to increase organ donation rates by speeding up the notification process.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a procedural requirement—hospitals must notify organ procurement agencies faster and share electronic health records. This is a coordination mandate designed to increase organ availability, not a deregulation, subsidy, or liability shield. The public health purpose (more transplants, more lives saved) is the bill's actual function.
What the text implies
- Electronic health record access by organ procurement agencies creates a new data-sharing pathway; the bill requires HHS guidance on cybersecurity and patient privacy, but implementation details (encryption, access logs, breach liability) are delegated to future rulemaking.
- Rural hospitals with poor broadband may face genuine compliance barriers despite exemptions; the bill funds no broadband infrastructure, leaving the burden on hospitals to solve connectivity gaps.
- Organ procurement agencies gain real-time visibility into hospital patient data; the bill does not explicitly restrict how that data may be used or retained after the notification event.
- The 2-year phase-in and exemption process create a patchwork compliance timeline; early-adopter hospitals may see competitive pressure to implement faster, while exempted hospitals may face donor-family questions about why their facility is not participating.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill expands access to life-saving organ transplants by removing delays in donor notification—a direct public health gain. The compliance burden on hospitals is real but manageable (2-year phase-in, exemptions for hardship), and the bill includes safeguards (cybersecurity protections, GAO oversight, guidance). Patients and families retain control over donation decisions; the bill only accelerates notification, not coercion.
Who stands to gain
- organ procurement organizations (operational efficiency, faster donor identification)
- transplant centers (increased donor availability)
- electronic health record vendors (implementation contracts, guidance compliance services)
Named in the bill
Medicare, Medicaid, organ procurement agencies, hospitals, critical access hospitals, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Government Accountability Office (GAO), electronic health record (EHR) companies
Where it stands
8 cosponsors: 5 Democrats, 3 Republicans.
- Jul 16, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jul 16, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce and House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
6 lobbying clients named this bill on 8 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $18,915,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 6 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 82% of bills with at least one filing.
Beth Van Duyne, the sponsor, reported $1,221,522 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. — $17,960,000 on 1 filing
- Syensqo USA LLC — $650,000 on 2 filings
- United Network for Organ Sharing — $110,000 on 2 filings
- Association of Organ Procurement Organizations — $105,000 on 1 filing
- American Society of Nephrology — $60,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (6,393 characters) on Aug 20, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Hospitals must alert organ agencies faster—but rural broadband gaps may leave some behind.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr4470 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.