Feds pay feed makers to buy invasive fish, support Bay watermen
H.R. 4294 — MAWS Act of 2026 · Filed by Sarah Elfreth (D-MD) · 10 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 7, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the Commerce Secretary to run a 2-year pilot program in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed that pays pet food, animal feed, and aquaculture feed manufacturers to buy blue catfish from local watermen and seafood processors. The goal is to reduce the invasive blue catfish population while supporting watermen's income. The Secretary must track the program's effects on the ecosystem, watermen's earnings, and market participation, then report findings to Congress with recommendations on whether to continue or expand it.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a federal purchase program designed to simultaneously address an ecological problem (invasive blue catfish) and support a specific working community (Chesapeake Bay watermen). It is neither pure environmental regulation nor pure economic subsidy, but a hybrid that ties the two together.
What the text implies
- The program's success depends on market demand for blue catfish products (pet food, animal feed, aquaculture feed). If manufacturers do not participate or demand is weak, watermen income gains may be limited despite federal funding.
- The bill requires the Secretary to determine a 'minimum price per pound' but does not specify how that price is set or whether it guarantees profitability for watermen—implementation details could significantly affect actual economic benefit.
- Abundance baseline data collection relies on a memorandum of understanding with Maryland, Virginia, and research institutions, but the bill does not mandate participation or specify consequences if partners do not cooperate, potentially weakening the scientific foundation for future policy.
- The pilot is limited to 2 years, creating uncertainty for watermen and manufacturers about long-term viability; early investment by manufacturers may not materialize if continuation is uncertain.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The program directly supports watermen's livelihoods while addressing an invasive species problem that degrades the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. Citizens benefit from both economic support for a working community and environmental restoration of a shared natural resource.
Who stands to gain
- pet food manufacturers
- animal feed manufacturers
- aquaculture feed manufacturers
- Chesapeake Bay watermen
- seafood processors
Named in the bill
Secretary of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Chesapeake Bay Program, Chesapeake Bay Invasive Catfish Workgroup, Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, District of Columbia, blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus)
Where it stands
10 cosponsors: 6 Democrats, 4 Republicans.
- Jul 7, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jul 7, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources and Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
- Jul 22, 2025 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Hearings Held”
- Jan 22, 2026 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jan 22, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent”
- Mar 16, 2026 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Wittman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended”
- Mar 17, 2026 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required)…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $250,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 9 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Sarah Elfreth, the sponsor, reported $478,564 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Pet Food Institute — $150,000 on 1 filing
- American Zoo and Aquarium Association — $100,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (10,329 characters) on Jul 6, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Feds pay feed makers to buy invasive fish, support Bay watermen” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr4294 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.