Military gains broader land-management authority off base
H.R. 4293 — To amend the Sikes Act to increase flexibility with respect to cooperative and interagency agreements for land management off of installations. · Filed by Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jul 7, 2025 · Hearing held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Sikes Act to allow the Department of Defense and National Guard to enter into cooperative agreements with states and other agencies for land management activities that occur off military installations, provided those activities support or relate to military operations. It expands the types of land-management partnerships the military can pursue beyond what the current law permits.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a narrow amendment to the Sikes Act that expands the Department of Defense's authority to enter into cooperative agreements for off-installation land management. It is a technical amendment to existing military authority, not a substantive policy change with broad civic implications.
What the text implies
- The phrase 'operations of the military installation' is broader than 'military activities' and may encompass administrative, logistical, or support functions beyond combat or training, potentially allowing the military to justify land-management agreements for purposes not previously contemplated.
- By allowing agreements that support 'State-owned National Guard installation' operations, the bill may enable states to use federal land-management authority to advance state-level military or emergency-management objectives with less federal oversight.
- The amendment does not specify what types of land-management activities qualify or establish public-interest safeguards (e.g., environmental review, public notice, or conservation standards), leaving implementation details to agency discretion.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill expands military flexibility in land-management partnerships, which may improve coordination with states on conservation and resource stewardship (a potential public benefit), but it also grants the military broader discretion to commit public land and resources to military-related purposes without clear constraints on what 'operations' may justify such agreements. The public interest depends on how the expanded authority is exercised and whether it prioritizes conservation or military
Named in the bill
Department of Defense, National Guard, Sikes Act, Section 103A(a)(2)
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Jul 7, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jul 7, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Armed Services and House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a…”
- Jul 22, 2025 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Hearings Held”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $350,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 1 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Juan Ciscomani, the sponsor, reported $1,708,777 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Bunge North America, Inc — $320,000 on 1 filing
- Fort Huachuca 50, Inc. — $30,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 17, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (280 characters) on Aug 29, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 17, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Military gains broader land-management authority off base” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr4293 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.