Congress funds affordable housing with labor protections—and ties it to Fannie Mae sale
H.R. 4266 — Housing for US Act · Filed by Thomas Suozzi (D-NY) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 30, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a federal revolving loan fund for states to finance affordable housing for middle-income Americans (earning 80–165% of area median income). It redirects future profits from the sale or release of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into a 10-year trust, which states can borrow from to establish their own housing loan programs. After 10 years, states repay the loans to reduce the federal deficit. The bill includes strong labor protections: apprenticeship requirements, prevailing wage standards (Davis-Bacon), and project labor agreements for construction projects.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a federal-to-state revolving loan fund for affordable housing, paired with mandatory labor standards (apprenticeships, prevailing wages, project labor agreements). It is not primarily a tax cut, deregulation, or corporate subsidy—it is a public financing tool with strong worker protections.
What the text implies
- The 10-year repayment requirement means states must budget for loan repayment starting in year 11, potentially constraining future housing investment unless Congress extends or forgives the obligation.
- Apprenticeship and prevailing wage requirements may increase construction costs, which could be passed to borrowers or reduce the number of units financed per dollar—a trade-off between affordability and volume.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
State housing finance agencies; Non-profit housing developers; Local governments