QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal funding for abortion travel: $350M to bypass state bans

H.R. 4265 — Reproductive Health Travel Fund Act of 2025 · Filed by Marilyn Strickland (D-WA) · 30 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 30, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Health Access Funding

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a $350 million annual federal grant program (2026–2030) to fund nonprofit and community-based abortion funds—organizations that help people pay for travel, lodging, meals, childcare, and other logistical costs to access abortion services in states where it is legal. The bill responds to the 2022 Dobbs decision, which eliminated the federal constitutional right to abortion and forced millions of people to travel hundreds of miles for care. Eligible organizations receive grants to cover these travel and support costs, with up to 15% of funds allowed for organizational overhead; the bill explicitly bars federal agencies from cooperating with state abortion prosecutions related to the program.

Why we flagged it

The bill is a straightforward appropriations measure designed to fund logistical support for abortion access in the post-Dobbs landscape. It is not a regulatory change, tax provision, or commemorative measure—it is direct federal funding for a public health access program.

What the text implies

  • The preemption clause (Section 3(g)) may trigger constitutional litigation over federal authority to override state abortion restrictions and state law enforcement, potentially reaching the Supreme Court.
  • The prohibition on federal cooperation with state antiabortion proceedings (Section 3(h)) creates a novel federal-state conflict: federal agencies must refuse to assist state prosecutors investigating abortion-related crimes, which may strain interagency cooperation and create enforcement gaps.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

nonprofit abortion funds and practical support organizations; community-based organizations serving reproductive health access

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record